On 31 Aug 2004 at 1:00, Jens Bladt wrote: > You are right, Rob. But everybody seem to say to me: > But, shurely you wount be selling your MZ-S!!!!! > Everybody who has seen my MZ-S (myself included) - loves it. It really IS a > beauty, isn't it? But I believe either the MZ-S or my 6x6 equipment has to go (I > have promissed my self not to increase my total photographic investments - to > buy photographic equioment, I must sell some). I've been thinking the same as > you, but the thruth is, I hardly ever use my MF-gear anyway. Maybe I should sell > my Exakta's first. Jens
It's a difficult decision but after I purchased my *ist D all I did was look at my MZ-S and think what lovely camera it was, I never actually used it. I figure that the *ist D offers as much automation (if not more) than the MZ-S and so I elected to keep my more traditional (and cheaper) manual bodies. The Exakta wouldn't return you too much cash I guess, wait a while and see if the *ist D will provide you with all you need then decide which to sell. There are some things that 35mm film will do slightly better than the *ist D but the 67 (or 6x6 in your case) does a whole lot better such as detailed landscapes. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
