Don't know if this is true.
http://www.zeiss.de/C12567A8003B58B9/ContentsWWWIntern/B97501AEF3869B76C1256E910023D1E3#Unbenannter%20Abschnitt_1
Alan Chan http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Nobody can answer this question for you. The two cameras are very different beast. Forget using the 645 lenses on a K-body. They suck optically compared to Pentax K-lenses. Mind you, this is not because Pentax lenses are worse than other MF lenses just that in general MF lenses are far inferior to the best 35mm lenses. Eg. the 75/2.8 standard lens is a very good MF lenses whereas if it had been a short K-mount telephoto it would be regarded as a dog. Incidentally, the FA645 was tested by Hasselblad test laboratory and produced similat MTF values and pictorial result as the Zeiss 80/2.8 for the Hasselblad proving that this quality level is more than adequate for MF.
_________________________________________________________________
Powerful Parental Controls Let your child discover the best the Internet has to offer. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN� Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*.
