They have a reputation, which in my experience inflates their price
beyond their capabilities, no matter how good they are.
Steve Pearson wrote:
Thanks Peter for the reference to that web site. I
looked thru most of it, and it was very helpful.
I still wish I could hear more feedback about some of
the other M42 lenses, such as Zeiss. There's just
something about that name that makes me think they are
better than the Pentax brand.
Thanks again everyone.
--- "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
http://www.aohc.it/indexe.htm
Steve Pearson wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a few questions for all of you screw mount
experts. I have always had K mount, and know very
little about the screw mount bodies. I have an ES
II
on it's way. My questions for you are:
If you could pick the best quality standard lens
for
this, would it be the 50mm 1.4, or a Zeiss, or
other???
What would you expect to pay for this lens on the
used
market today?
Finally, if anyone can refer me to a website that
can
explain the metereing of this body, along with the
many M42 lenses that are available, that would be
fantastic. If such a thing exists.
TIA for any help...
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter
now.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
--
Politicians are interested in people. Not that this
is a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs.
P. J. O'Rourke
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
--
Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is a virtue. Fleas are interested
in dogs.
P. J. O'Rourke
