It's no harder (and no easier) to put a 100% viewfinder in the *ist-D than to put one in the MZ-S; in both cameras the viewfinder is optical. 100% viewfinders are expensive - far more expensive than 9x% finders.
> This is probably a silly question which has been discussed to bits, but I > was wondering if someone could give me the quick answer as to why it was too > hard to put a 100% viewfinder in the ist D (as opposed to the 90something > percent..) > > Thanks, > Ryan > >
