Thanks Nick, I appreciate the warning. Don
> -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 2:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Future of Film > > > I'd avoid the Minolta Scan Dual II. Mine was a real dog, failing > to line up consistently, twain driver never worked, etc. Nikon > scanners are a far better bet, I've had the Coolscan II and now > the LS4000. Friends have the Coolscan III and V and have had no problems. > > Nick > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Don Sanderson"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 30/08/04 22:55:38 > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Future of Film > > The street price of this thing is $129.00. > It's the baby version of my pf1800 AFL, NOT recommended! > I'm currently looking for a Minolta Scan Dual XX. > > Don > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel J. Matyola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 2:11 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Future of Film > > > > > > I received an email today from Costco. One of their > "Featured Products" > > of the month is a 35mm film/slide scanner! Obviously, > someone there > > thinks there is still a market for film related products. > > > > http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?prodid=10016148&whse=&to > pnav=&cat= > > On the other hand, just how good can a $79 fim scanner be, > even if that > is a reduced salep[rice? > > >
