Toralf, LOL... I haven't bothered with Kodak since... uh... -95, I think. Kodak had an "exclusive" colour negative film (ektar 25?) that I thought would be better off in their hands. The prints produced were downright odd, so I asked a local 1-hour to redo them, and with a much better result... Haven't shot much negative film in my life, but now my kids are beginning to pick up a little bit on photography so I might as well prepare myself while they grow old enough to be trusted to a digicam...:-)
Like you said, I have also considered them to be too cheap to be good. If you try them out, could you post a comment on how things went? Jostein Toralf wrote: > Found one of their envelopes in my Postbox today. The price was > unbelievably low, in the sense "so low that I can't believe the results > are be any good"; NOK29 for development *and* prints for a 24-picture > film. Then again, they might be no worse than what you pay 59 for at > Japan Photo... And if the *development* is all right, I don't care that > much about the prints. > > BTW, did you ever try the "Exclusive" development at Kodak, Kolbotn? > Will it give much better results than their "standard" job? And what's > that like, anyway? > > >Their film is either a Konica or an Agfa, I think. > > > > > Yeah, that's more or less what I thought. Surely it can't be that bad > then? Or do e.g. Agfas with various other brands printed on them (I've > seen a few variants) have lower-quality than the ones with their own label? >
