Also (and I think that's too in Ebay's rules) the feedback should take into
account how *both* partners handle possible complaints. If I (as a seller)
provide feedback immediately after I ship the goods I cannot do this.
If a buyer has a problem with what he received from me I certainly do my best to
satisfy him - but I also expect him to be reasonable. This is still part of the
transaction and included in my feedback.

Leaving the feedback of both partners disclosed for some weeks (and whether or
not they have given any) would work well, I guess, but it would probaby lead to
more negative feedback in total - and I doubt that Ebay has any interest in
seeing that.

Sven


Zitat von Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> The hidden feedback is a good idea.  Sellers also have the problem, not
> just buyers.  If they give honest bad feedback to a buyer who was slow
> to pay, or gave the seller a hard time, then the buyer might get revenge
> by posting bad feedback in return, even if the seller completed his end
> of the bargain perfectly.  Sellers with 100% pos feedback are especially
> vunerable to intimidation by unscrupulous buyers.
>
> rg
>
>
> Dan wrote:
> > Yes this is a problem.  I am in this situation myself as a buyer of
> sub-standard
> > goods.  I think a hidden feedback system would be better where the feedback
> was
> > only revealed once both parties had submitted their feedback.  If only one
> > party submitted then after a certain time limit the feedback would be
> revealed
> > and the other party could no longer leave feedback (to prevent revenge).
> >
> >
> >>On Aug 31, 2004, at 10:30 PM, Alan Chan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I think the eBay feedback system has a serious flaw. Sellers have not
> >>>been forced to leave +ve feedback once the payment was received and
> >>>confirmed. This puts the buyers in a disadvantage situation when
> >>>things gone wrong. Often the buyers won't leave -ve feedback because
> >>>the sellers might just do the same as revenge.
> >>>
> >>>Alan Chan
> >>>http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
> >
> >
> >
>
>



Reply via email to