On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 17:13:27 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm very sorry about my post. This is my fault. I did searched the pdml.org > for the rules and abbriviations (like PAW, PESO etc), but I didn't found any one. > I think that the rool You mentioned is wise one. I will try not to break it againe. > > > > -- > Best regards, > dao mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > dao, First, no need to apologize. You didn't know, so that's why I told you. Not so much that you "did something wrong", just so that you know for the future, that's all. And, since Tom's mini-FAQ isn't linked to from the official PDML site, you couldn't really find it. Tom posts it every Sunday (if he remembers - I think he did remember this week <g>), but if you missed his post, you'd have no way of knowing. BTW, those aren't really rules, just helpful hints and guidelines, very informal, that Tom put together (with input from the rest of us) as a way of easing new people into the list. So, again, no need to apologize. Now, what I also should have done in my first post to you, is welcome you to the list. If you've been lurking for a while, you'll know that there is no shortage here of expertise in things Pentax, as well as general photographic knowledge. I'm sure you'll enjoy yourself, and I look forward to hearing your views, and hopefully seeing some of your images. Welcome aboard!! cheers, frank from Toronto, Canada -- "It's about time we started to take photography seriously and treat it as a hobby." -Eliott Erwitt
