Hi Mark, I seem to recall some discussion about 120 efke a few years ago. Guess I was mistaken about the source. Now you've got me wondering who may have made the comment .... well, thanks for the correction.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: Mark Dalal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pentax Discuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 9/7/2004 10:11:00 PM > Subject: Re: Slower Film 4 Frank (was nsomething else) > > Shel wrote: > > >Been using Efke 25 for a couple of years now, since > >soon after APX 25 was discontinued. I like it. > YMMV, >especially since you don't do your own > processing. >Haven't tried the 50 and 100 speeds > though as my local >shop only carries the 25. It's > also available in 120, >which I have in my freezer but > which I've not tried. >Reports on it (the 120)have > been pretty good, although >Mark Dalal didn't like the > physical characteristics of >the film base, backing, > whatever it's called (the stuff >the emulsion is > coated on). He thought it was too thin. > > For the record, I've never shot Efke 25 or any Efke > film (although I'd like to). That piece of feedback > isn't mine. > > Mark > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
