frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 10:41:52 -0400, Peter J. AllingThe execrable Kodak Max 400. Scans nicely though. The web size doesn't do justice to the full scan.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This didn't seem to get to the list apologies if you receive it twice
I promised more shots from the Vivitar 35-85mm f2.8 varifocal so here they are in no particular order. As always comments are requested but may be ignored.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_--_I_see_you.html
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_--_Bridge.html
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_--_Boardwalk.html
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_--_kittens.html
It showed up twice for me, FWIW. No problem, because I'm having list and/or internet/e-mail problems, too.
I like the first one - nice narrow dof, lovely bokeh, I like the
grain. What film did you use?
I don't know her name, she hangs out in the coffee shop I frequent a friend of one of the employees. She's done some paid modeling for a local pro-photographer IIRC. (Now, now Frank, it's not what youThe second one (bridge) is the weakest of the bunch, IMHO. Not a bad shot, just doesn't say much to me, I guess.
I like the boardwalk photo. It would be ordinary except for the shadow. That really emphasizes the feeling of perspective, IMHO.
Kittens is a lovely informal portrait. The young lady looks very
relaxed and happy. Who is she?
think, at least it better not be she's probably barely 17).
cheers, frank
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke

