I thought the istd was 12 bits ... is it really 16 bits? Shel
> [Original Message] > From: Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The blanket statement that "RAW/uncompressed storage is the only way to go for > serious digital photography" is perfectly valid when referring to the *ist D > (which was the basis of the discussion). I always prefer to have access to a > file with 16bits depth per colour channel than 8bits (ie larger file size) from > any other high performance digital imaging equipment. I'd rather have control > of what data is discarded.
