Hi Paul .... >From what I see on your site, I'm not overly impressed with the lens. What may make a better comparison (at least for me, not that I'm asking that you do it) is to make comparisons with similar focal length primes and put them up side by side.
Shel > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I shot a few things around my house and yard today to see how the DA > 16-45 performs. I'm very pleased. I shot at 20, 31 and 45 mm. The 20mm > shot (of doors) is at f4.5. I extracted a small section from the center > of this shot and posted it as well. It's at 100%. The shot of the tree > is 31mm at f11. The shot of the flower is 45mm at f5.6. Although it's > hard to judge results on the web, the tight crop of the near wide-open, > wide angle shot provides some useful information. The shots are here: > http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder.tcl?folder_id=429139
