Since Barrel distortion is at the edge of the frame I would assume it's much less of a problem on the *ist-d/ds.

CRB wrote:

Wouldn't this be a decent portrait length for APS-class Digital?

My only wish is that the optical quality is better than the 43/1.9 with its barrel 
issues.  If this is just another Tessar it will be average, but if it's optimized for 
digital imaging then it might really sell the bodies.  (Like software selling 
computers.)

Sincerely,

C. Brendemuehl
--------------------------------
"Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first." Ronald Reagan



_______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web!






--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke





Reply via email to