Alan Chan a écrit :
I can think of 2 "technical" reasons why the mechanical coupling was not employed in *istD & *istDS.
No Alan, The design of the *ist DS is why the mechanical coupling was not employed in *istD & *istDS. !!
Michel
Alan Chan a écrit :
I can think of 2 "technical" reasons why the mechanical coupling was not employed in *istD & *istDS.
No Alan, The design of the *ist DS is why the mechanical coupling was not employed in *istD & *istDS. !!
Michel