It might be that stitching together a number of smaller negatives is easier and less expensive. Think of the gear the landscape photographer must carry into sometimes difficult terrain - the size, the weight, and the cost. With a DSLR every part of that equation is reduced, perhaps substantially. So, depending on ones resources, determination, and physical abilities, the DSLR approach may be the better one.
Shel > From: J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Maybe, but which is easier, developing and scanning > one LF exposure/negative or shooting and stitching 16 or more > smaller exposures together?
