On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:30:44 +0100, mike.wilson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
> I think a MkII.
> http://www.motorbase.com/vehicle/by-id/931/
> 
> Having stood in that damp environment for a few years, everything below
> the waistline will have rotted and it probably went for spares or an
> _extremely_ expensive restoration.
> 

Yes.  Mk IV.  I said Series IV, but I was wrong.  Mea culpa.

thanks, Mike,
frank
-- 
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Reply via email to