I like the specs on the OM-2S and love the lenses, but a local repair center claimed that the bodies have reliability problems. One of our local eBay speculators won't even touch them anymore after getting burned by several defective 2S's. I've never used them myself, though, so I'm just passing on what I've heard.
Chris On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:38:55 -0400, Collin Brendemuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The OM-2S Program comes pretty close. > I really enjoy handling it. Nice body. > > Sincerely, > > C. Brendemuehl > -------------------------------- > 'Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize > that it bears a very close resemblance to the first.' Ronald Reagan > > > ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > From: Chris Brogden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:54:18 -0500 > > >Sounds like an FM3A with IDM metering and a spot meter added. Good > >luck finding a body like that for $500. > > > >Chris > > > > > >On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:03:07 -0400, Collin Brendemuehl > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If Pentax were to produce one last new film cameras, what would you want it to be? > >> > >> My choice would be something like the LX but cut cost by eliminating the > >> removable finder and use a different mirror bumper system that doesn't need > >> regular maintenance (sticky mirror). Add the other modes, "A" interface, and a > >> spot meter & we're set. Probably a $500 body. But built to last a lifetime. > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net > >
