Hi, > Thus, using a 20mm as a walking around lens is not so > clever. Changing lenses would have taken too much time. > The obvious solution might after all be a zoom lense, like a 28-105. I am > thinking about buying one now. But then again, maybe using a longer prime > lens as walking around lens might be better. One mostly has more time to > change to a wide angle when the picturesque landscape or the like > "appears", than the other way around. At least that's what I think. So what > about let's say a FA 100/2.8 (too heavy?) or the FA 135/2.8 (too long?)? > I am still quite a novice so any advice is really appreciated. Thanks
I have found that using 2 bodies, one with a 35mm lens and one with a 90mm or 85mm lens, covers the great majority of situations. -- Cheers, Bob Art is anything you can get away with -- Marshall McLuhan
