i really have no idea. my point was that even under much better than "real" condition, it's pretty damn far from 3000x2000 *resolved* pixels.
mishka On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 08:21:04 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mishka" > Subject: Re: 100 ISO v 200 ISO - Digital resolution > > > if you mean by resolution "what is resolved" (as opposed to "the # > > of pixels > > I have"), you are way overly optimistic. you have 1800x1700 *at > > best*, with > > the 1000:1 contrast. see > > http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxistd/page17.asp > > Does anyone really take pictures at 1000:1? > Whats the resolution at 1.6:1? > > William Robb > >
