Hah! I believed you the first time. I just wanted you to post more
pictures of this loverly creature! <g>
keith whaley
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I know that this lovely lady might appear static in the frame I posted,
but note the way her hair is moving. However, as further evidence of her
speed, I've posted two frames. I was shooting continuous, so I assume
these are betwen 1/3 and 1/2 second apart. Note how far she has moved in
respect to the building in the background.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2813593&size=lg
On Oct 23, 2004, at 5:32 PM, Keith Whaley wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
It's not all that soft, considering that the lady is walking rapidly...
I don't think so. What I mean is, the way her arms are crossed, she
LOOKS static.
But then, you were there, so I defer to you.
keith whaley
...and this is a hand held shot. Later, I'll post some portraits I
shot with it. Perhaps even some 100% detail. You're looking at a tiny
web image, Raimo, and drawing unfair conclusions.
Paul
On Oct 23, 2004, at 4:25 PM, Raimo K wrote:
Yeah, soft is correct... no matter who swears by this lens.
The girl is soft, too.
All the best!
Raimo K
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 11:10 PM
Subject: RE: PAW: Pretty Lady
The lens has a nice, soft quality about it. I like that, and the
bokeh in
this pic looks pretty decent as well.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Decided to spend a few minutes trying out the FA 80-320/4.5-5.6
that I
bought this week. I know it's not highly rated -- it's obviously a
consumer zoom -- but I'm rather pleased with it. I shot people
walking
down the street with the camera set to continuous autofocus. This
young
lady was probably the most photogenic. This shot is at 320mm, f6.7 @
1/500, ISO 400. I'm beginning to really like autofocus zooms for
informal, just for fun shoots. Until this year, I had never really
shot
with a zoom and had never owned an autofocus camera. There's
something
to be said for sloth <g>..
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2813285
