PaulOn Oct 23, 2004, at 6:38 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Hmmm... I don't have permission to show her images, hence I put a tiny tiny
pic on upper right corner, just to give you a rough idea of the portion I've
cut.
The detail is just a straigh (unresized) cut from the original frame.
OK, my question is: Camera: ISO: Focal length: Aperture: Shutter speed: RAW conversion/JPEG straight from camera:
Dario
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 12:13 AM Subject: Re: Samples from today's shoot with the FA 80-320
I can't guess. But cab we see the full image? A 100% detail is
meaningless unless we know how large the original image was. (At least
I think it is :-). However, I have to say that i've never seen a 100%
detail anywhere near that sharp from any of my 72 meg *ist D files. Nor
have I seen a 100% detail that sharp from a drum-scanned 6z7 image.
Paul
On Oct 23, 2004, at 6:08 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
A 100% detail: http://www.dariobonazza.com/paw/5004det.jpg
Guess shooting data?
Dario
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 11:36 PM Subject: Samples from today's shoot with the FA 80-320
Here's a more telling example of the FA 80-320. No, it's not a
superior
lens. But I think it's a very good lens for the money. The first shot
is at f6,7, 120mm, handheld at 1/90. However, I think it's fairly
steady. (Remember, this is the field of view of a 180mm lens.) The
second is a 100% detail from the hi-res version of that shot. If I
have time, I'll do some tests off a tripod. But I'm convinced that
this
lens is no bow-wow.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2813525&size=lg
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2813529
