http://dantestella.com/technical/helios.html
mishka On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:28:23 +0200, Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Stregevsky wrote: > > >Alan is correct. Get the 77 for all-around use. > > > >If the 77 disappoints you for portraits, spend another $150 and get a Helios > >85/1.5 (M42, preset, huge and heavy, but a great portrait lens). > > > > > Hmmm. I'm tempted to get one of those, now. I must admit I have a > strange liking for slightly odd equipment of this kind... Any other > opinions on it (besides the usual "it's-Russian-so-it-must-be-crap")? > > - Toralf > >
