Hi, Monday, October 25, 2004, 2:52:11 AM, J. wrote:
> No, your super rare IS super rare. What I said > was the only time the slow film would be an > advantage is if you wanted to use wide apertures > on bright sunny days and shooting into lights. > all other situations could be handled with > ND fitlter that you are just too lazy to use. And > now a days almost every lens CAN use a ND > so your so called argument is the one that > isnt standing up. this is now just a pissing contest. In each of your replies to one of my posts you've distorted what I said. I never said anything at all about shooting into the light, or even about what most people would consider a wide aperture - just an aperture wider than f/11. To cap it all you now characterise my shooting style as 'lazy', when it's something that I have developed from experience and which works well for me, so rather than addressing arguments you've turned to insults. Well, fine. You can piss further and higher than I can, I admit it. -- Cheers, Bob
