The Pentax 110 was a curious system for Pentax to release.  When I collected
cameras,  I picked up the camera and all of the lenses that went with it,
including the big tele unit.  Even got the transparent and beige colored
models.

Jim A.

> From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:18:08 -0600
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: M42 ultra-wide
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:19:18 -0400
> 
> I'm coming to the conclusion that I can't find a really good reason to buy
> an 'APS' sized lens, especially if one already has some regular 35mm lenses
> that work perfectly fine on the *ist D.  If Pentax were to release a FF
> digital body that is affordable (or becomes affordable), then a wide-angle
> APS prime would only be of real value on the body with an APS sized sensor.
> 
> It seems to me that digital bodies and lenses would quickly become
> disposable (throwaway/almost never used).  I'd rather buy a 35mm lens than
> invest in the smaller format lenses.
> 
> In a couple of years I bet the *istD will be the equivalent of the Pentax
> 110 SLR.
> 
> 
> 
> Tom C.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: RE: M42 ultra-wide
>> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:30:26 -0400
>> 
>> are there no APS format prime lenses with the KA mount
>> wider than 20mm? It seems absurd to use a huge expensive lens like
>> the 15mm SMCT/K/KA for APS sensor format.
>> JCO
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:22 AM
>> To: pentax list
>> Subject: Re: M42 ultra-wide
>> 
>> 
>> On 25/10/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>> 
>>> Are the 15/3.5 SMC-Takumars actually
>>> availible now and then?
>> 
>> I've seen one in a long time and that was actually a K mount. They do
>> exist apparently.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Cotty
>> 
>> 
>> ___/\__
>> ||   (O)   |     People, Places, Pastiche
>> ||=====|    http://www.cottysnaps.com
>> _____________________________
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to