"Strange, I remember finding pictures from the 16-45 rather dark, and in a german user forum there had been lots of lengthy discussions and pictures about the 16-45 making too dark pictures."

On the dpreview Pentax DSLR discussion forum, one occasionally sees complaints that the *ist D underexposes.

It is hard to evaluate these complaints. Has the person done Auto Levels in Photoshop? If not, the image will appear dull, which might be confused with dark.

But I also wonder if people who have this problem are using program metering. In Pentax's film SLRs, program metering was designed to expose for shadow areas -- so it would often blow out highlights or generally overexpose. Since blown-out highlights make a digital image useless, I wonder if program metering on the *ist D is biased toward toning down highlights, thus making images darker.

I use center-weighted averaging for nearly all shots (a few are done with spot metering), and find that my *ist D exposures are fine -- with the DA 16-45 and all other lenses.

Joe



Reply via email to