I wouldn't say the critiquing we were subjected to was contemptuous. The
only time I saw that was when there was something personal about it, and
that was really very rare. It could be harsh in that the instructors were
trying very hard to make us understand what would be expected of us "out
there," and well, college students can be pretty dense. All I was trying to
say is that sometimes criticism that seems harsh can be a very effective way
to learn -- especially when it makes you defend your work.
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: About PUG Commentaries
>
>
> > I see a trend going here as well. Those who have been to some kind of
> > > formalized training seem to accept that a "contemptuous" style of
> critique
> > > is acceptable and normal.
> > >
> > > Those that have not, do not see it that way.
> > >
>
> That kind of style is usually attributed to those who are "formally
trained"
> beyond their knowledge.
> Ed
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
