What are "quantization effects?"

Once I understand that term (and I think I do, but I need to be sure), then
all else will probably fall into place.

Aside from that, I always have a hard time pulling subtle details from
shadows in B&W negatives, and it really pisses me off.  Recently I've been
thinking that it was a mistake getting this Nikon scanner since it doesn't
seem to do the job well in Zones I & II & III.  Mot long ago I was thinking
that better scans can be had if the negs were "fatter" in the shadows, and
having fooled around a bit with some negs, that seems to be the case. 
Unfortunately, detail in deep shadow is an important part of my work, and I
hate it when it just disappears. Maybe it's my scanning technique or
Photoshop skills that's the problem.  I'll wait for your definition ...

Shel 


> [Original Message]
> From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I thought you'd know :-)
>
> B&W is *all* about light and shade.  There's a great deal of
> post-exposure manipulation done to create the perfect print;
> either in the development stage, or in printing.  Digital
> doesn't give you any options at development time - everything
> is done by manipulating the response curves.  If you're trying
> to pull detail out of the shadows you'll find that the linear
> response of a digital sensor means you get quantization effects
> rather than a smooth range of grey tones.
>
> You get the same efffect with colour images, of course, but
> if there's significant chroma detail the eye will often ignore
> the intensity artifacts (just as JPEG artifacts that are very
> apparent in smoothly-shaded areas are hard to spot in areas
> where image detail is changing rapidly and unpredictably).
>
>
> Shel Belinkoff mused:
> > 
> > Why is that?  (esp for B&W)
> > 
> > being a B&W shooter, that sort of thing really is of interest.
> > 
> > Shel 
> > 
> > 
> > > [Original Message]
> > > From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > > There are still a few situations where 12 bits
> > > isn't enough (especially if you want B&W images).
> > 
> > 


Reply via email to