I do, for one. There really isn't any choice if you're trying to follow the action of something as fast-paced as motorsports (unless you're good enough to track focus by hand. I'm not).
Jens Bladt mused: > > I have had coninous AF available since I got my first Zl in 1992. I never > really likie/used it. It's too slow and too automatic. I still don't use it. > I like the optional auto selection or manual selection of the AF point (MZ-S > or *ist D)much better. > > I wonder if anybody really uses AF-C, except for > clip-zoom-mode/power-zoom-work, perhaps? > > Jens Bladt > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt > > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: Leon Altoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sendt: 4. november 2004 20:39 > Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Emne: Re: *ist DS and continuous autofocus > > > David, > > That's my thinking. I like to set the camera the way I want it, not > have some functions only available when something else is on. > > Leon > > > On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 08:57:51 -0500, David Zaninovic wrote: > > >And Action picture mode implies that you can't set many custom settings, > right ? > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Leon Altoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 17:12:33 -0500, David Zaninovic wrote: > >> > >> >Does the *ist DS have focus tracking ? > >> > >> The istDS review on DP Review says it has continuous auto focus, but > >> you need to select the "Action" picture mode. The AF switch has only > >> AF and MF. > >> > >> The istD has AF-C as well as AF-S and MF. I am not a believer in > >> picture modes, so I'm happy with my istD. > > > >
