As has been noted here before, flash photography with the *istD is tricky. First, you should shoot at iso400. Second, shoot RAW, so you can easily correct exposure problems. In truth, if these were RAW format, and I had to work with them to produce a suitable shot, I'd opt for the first one. Both the third and fourth have way too much flash in my opinion.
Paul
On Nov 6, 2004, at 8:42 PM, Amita Guha wrote:


Last weekend, we shot a bunch of photos of my friend Sue, a musician and
singer, for her website. This was the first time I really got to use my new
Sigma EF-500 flash. A lot of the photos came out fine, but some came out
really dark. Here are some samples. The first two are dark, the third is too
bright and the fourth looks good.


http://www.sunny16.net/sue-flash.htm

I shot everything at aperture priority, and the flash fired every single
time. What went wrong?


Thanks,
Amita





Reply via email to