Bob, It's a nice lens. The f4 is too slow. And you'll be dead a long time. Enjoy life now! Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 18:57:55 -0800, Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I knew it! I knew it! I knew it! Wheatfield (soon to be Snowfield) Willie > was right! > > I just HAD to get another lens! > > 165/2.8 for the 67 off ebay for US$247.52. I'm feeling so thrilled and > ashamed at the same time! > > I said to myself, "You already have a 165/4 with a leaf shutter!" > "But I need the speed and narrower DOF!" > "But you already have a 165/4 with a leaf shutter!" > "But The narrower DOF will help with the portraits of pretty girls!" > "Pretty girls will only get within 500mm range of you!" > "But the price is sooo good!" > "But you already owe your soul to Visa!" > "Damn it! I'm buying it!" > "You'll be sorry!" > "I don't care!" > > Click! > > That was the sound of the bid confirmation button being pushed, and it was > all over. > > I'm powerless over this addiction. > > I need help! > > Regards, > Bob... > > From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > This medium format thing is going to be my financial undoing! The > > obsession has now taken full control of my mind and the compulsion that > > follows has now led me to buy a 645 with 75mm lens and extra 220 film > > carriers, another 67 lens, a converter so that I can use the 67 lenses on > > the 645, a couple of straps, another slave flash and another Pelican case. > > Today I went out and burned up three rolls of 220 on crap! > > > > But damn it was FUN! > > > > OOOWAAHAHAHAAAR! > > > > Maybe there's a 12 step group for this... > > > > Regards, > > Bob... > > > > > > > >
