If there's anything you want to take up with me personally, Shel, then please do. Jostein ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 12:32 AM Subject: Re: MagnumPhotos on Darfur,Sudan
> I was thinking of the diatribe resulting from a couple of photos I posted > recently, of the comments made towards me, about the people in the photos, > and about the relevance and appropriateness of the posted photos Of course > my post was facetious, but it was also a bit sarcastic and angry, for I'm > still bitter about some things that were said. I probably should have > held off pressing the send button with this post, but the anger and > frustration I felt then has not subsided or dissipated very much. > > Shel > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > There are some great shots here, and some very ordinary ones. I don't > > know that I find the blurry shots particularly interesting. The blur > > doesn't seem to contribute to the message. As far as people on the list > > objecting to shots of those in distress, I can't recall that ever > > happening. Thus, I don't understand the purpose of Shel's obviously > > facetious message. > > Paul > > On Nov 12, 2004, at 4:10 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > > > Really! Putting up pictures of people in distress and suffering has no > > > place on the pentax list. Are you trying to push your political or > > > social > > > agenda here. It's been determined by a "minority consensus" that > > > photos of > > > this sort are unwelcome and out of place on this list. Please stick to > > > landscapes, pictures of flowers, or those of pets. > >
