Re: 3D quality in a lens?

[DagT]

Of course the situation is more detailed.  Among other things it 
depends on when you lost the stereoscopic vision (I lost mine at the 
worst time, around 2-3), if you have any cooperation between the eyes 
at all (I don�t, some do) and a lot on practice.  I did manage to play  
table tennis after a lot of training, but only back hand.

Fast downhill skiing is something else, I do that too.  Usually you 
know how far away the slope is, because you know where your feet are.  
Jumping between boulders on trips into the mountains is dangerous, 
because it is difficult to see the how big a rock is.  The difference 
between 50cm and 150cm height hurts, especially with 20 kilos on your 
back...

DagT
P� 13. nov. 2004 kl. 21.03 skrev Mishka:
interesting: my SO sees essentially with only one eye too, but she
plays tennis (not a pro,
but quite OK) and loves downhill skiing (fast).
best,
mishka
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:09:26 CST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dag said:
That�s not completely true.  I lack stereoscopic vision (although 
both
eyes work they don�t cooperate).  You should try playing tennis with
one eye :-) The fast 3D vision doesn�t work at all, but in slower
actions you find ways to compensate like recognizing size of known
objects, seeing relative movements (normal people use this at larger
distances), differences is sharpness (at close distances)  etc.
Oh, cool! Someone else who sees the world the same way I do.
(No tennis for me, though. Hopeless at all ball sports throughout 
school years.)

ERN