The *istD way makes more sense to me - leaves you in control of amount of exposure for each shot.
Bruce Monday, November 15, 2004, 10:44:03 AM, you wrote: J> I've only tried this once, and IIRC, it doesn't work exactly the same J> way as it did on Z-1. J> The Z-1 would subtract some time from each exposure to make the final J> result correct. J> I think the *istD doesn't do that, but rather take all exposures J> straight according to the meter. J> Jostein J> ----- Original Message ----- J> From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> J> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> J> Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:20 PM J> Subject: Multiple exposures with * ist D >> Any listers have experience using this function? >> I'd like to hear of your experience/comments on using this function. J> Was >> exposure acceptable etc? >> >> Kenneth Waller >>
