On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:50:59 +0100
Frantisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> OTOH, some of them are really sneaky. It includes some "competitions"
> which are simply ripoffs. Like the "Cohasset Colonials Photography
> Competition", giving  your picture to an advertising of some furniture
> for mere 100$, and not even in cash, but in gift certificate! Same is
> the "2005 Shaker Workshops Photography Competition". Clear ripoffs.
> Perhaps you should remove them from the list? Of course that's up to

I thought about this and there were some competitions where _all_ entries
became the property of the person/company running it, usually image libraries.
I thought this was a bit too much. I think for others, where they payment, or
'prize' is simply some gift vouchers or even a mere $100.00, my way of thinking
was that this would be up to the individual photographer to value their
own work. Whilst I may not myself pariticipate in such a contest, others 
may feel it a good opportunity to get published, perhaps some practice at
a subject they have difficulty with, or even just a fun subject where the
prize is not of concern.

I would very much like to hear from anyone else on this and if the
sentiment is to remove such contests, I will do so. I really would not
know where to draw the line.

Kind regards
Kevin


-- 
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. 
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."

Reply via email to