Knarf, I don't consider it rude at all. You simply stated reasons why you
did/like what you did & your responses make sense to me. I don't necessarily
agree but we both have own takes on the same scene.


Kenneth Waller

----- Original Message -----
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: PAW: Walk and Talk


> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:33:14 -0500, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Frank FWIW, I think it would be a far stronger image if the people on
the
> > far LH side were cropped out, maybe just crop out all to the Left of the
end
> > of the brick wall. I don't see that they add anything to Walk & Talk.
> > BTW< its not all that obvious that the guy has a phone stuck in his ear.
> > Just my penny's worth.
>
> Thanks, Ken, for looking at and commenting on the photo.
>
> I'm not saying for a moment that you aren't correct in what you say,
> but I thought about cropping the way you suggest, and I don't think
> that for me the photo would be saying what I'd like it to say.
>
> I think that, for one, it would be oppressively dark if the photo
> ended at the edge of the wall.  I think the "light at the end of the
> tunnel" balances the dark shadows of the wall and overhanging trees
> nicely.
>
> As well, cropping would lose that line in the sidewalk, which I think
> is a strong element WRT the perspective and "tunnel effect" (which is
> much of what I think the photo speaks of).  To me, the photo would
> work if the phone guy weren't in there - just the wall and sidewalk
> converging toward a point in the distance, with the OOF people beyond
> the trees.  That Mr. Phone Guy is in there only adds to that
> perspective, just because he's moving in that direction, and a bit
> tilted that way, too.
>
> You're right, the phone thing isn't obvious.  That's why I titled it
> the way I did, so people would notice that, even though it's really a
> small part of what I see the photo being about.  It's really not a
> very good title, and I may change it.
>
> I hope you don't consider it rude to ask for comments, then appear to
> dismiss yours.  I'm not doing that, really.  I'm glad you commented,
> and your comments did make me think about the photo in a different way
> than I did before.  However, after considering your thoughts, I don't
> think they'd work for me.  That being said, you may be right and I may
> be wrong...  <vbg>
>
> Thanks again,
> frank
>
>
>
> --
> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson
>

Reply via email to