Thanks Sam for allowing me to reply to Tim on your
email.
Tim, I appreciate the info info and link. I suppose
that embedded somewhere in that link is my answer, but
a couple clarifications..if I may and I'll go away.
Did you arrive at 3,500 ppi by multiplying 35mm by
100mb? Coincidence? How did you arrive at "410" for
the 6x6?
In the case sited, if I want equivilent information
when ordering scans, the 6x6 should be specified as
410MB?
That's it. I'll be content with your answer sans
quaqmire.
Jack
--- Sam Jost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Guess I don't have enough to do:)
>
> I agree.
>
> Sam
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
