On the web, the *istD image appears to be far superior. There is considerably 
more detail, and it looks sharper. 
Paul


> William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: Re: P67 vs D1s -- photo.net
> > He should have chosen the EF50/1.7 and the SMCP 105/2.4 for
> his test.
> > And he should have gotten a high end optical print made from
> the 
> > film, rather than a scan.
> 
> Hi everybody,
> 
> About this topic, I performed a film vs. digital test while in
> Prague.
> I shot the same scene with both the LX and the *istD, using the
> M 20/4, set at infinity, planning to do a optical print from the
> slide film (a Fuji Provia 100F) and a digital (still from a wet
> process, though) print from the *istD file. I made a 30x45cm
> (12x18'') print from the slide and a 20x30cm (8x12'') from the
> *istD file, to have the same magnification and thus comparable
> details on the two final prints.
> Last step was a couple of 600dpi scans of the buildings (note
> that the details are quite small compared to the actual print).
> The pictures shown are 100% crops of those details: 
> 
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder.tcl?folder_id=137823
> 
> I tried to reduce the differences in the colours of the two (the
> original *istD file - and print - was a bit more yellowish), to
> better show the differences in grain and resolution. The *istD
> file had also been modified with a slight sharpening and
> darkened (still in order to match more the slide) before
> printing.
> From what I can see, the *istD image shows a little more fine
> details, although there is a certain loss in the saturation of
> some colours (the slide was quite dark compared to the digital
> picture, so it may have preserved better the colours in the
> highlights of the scene).
> The print from the slide costed me 18 Euros (what is that now,
> US$ 23, right?) and the (smaller) print from the file 2 Euros. A
> 30x45cm print from the file (that I made anyway, with good
> results) was 5 Euros (US$ 6.50).
> What do you think?
> 
> Ciao,
> 
> Gianfranco
> 
> 
> 
> =====
> _
> 
> 
>               
> __________________________________ 
> Do you Yahoo!? 
> Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. 
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
> 

Reply via email to