On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 20:11:45 -0500, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because I have nothing better to do (at least until I have to pick up > my daughter at the train station), I decided to make another version of > this shot. I pulled down the sky highlights as much as possible without > resorting to a pasted in sky, and I cloned out the mirror. Both are > provided for your scrutiny. Which version is the best way to go on this > one? > Paul > > The original version: > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2907524&size=lg > The modified version: > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2907709&size=lg > > Perhaps a version with a comosited sky is next. > >
I say "original". It looks more "natural" (what ever the hell that means <g>). The second one, mom's makeup looks too clownish. Mind you, an argument could be made that that's the way to go... cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
