Re: Samples from 14 2.8

[Paul Stenquist]

Okay, my mistake. I figured out how to see the hi-res versions. (You 
have to click "original.") Yes, the corners are very soft. The DA 
`16-45 outperforms this lens if that's the best it can do. But I do 
want to believe that it's good. I'd love to have a great 14/2.8. 
Perhaps this is a bad sample. I hope so.
On Nov 25, 2004, at 9:26 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:

On 25 Nov 2004 at 19:53, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I can't really draw any conclusions from these itty-bitty web images. 
I
want to see a 70 megabyte file before I condemn or endorse a lens.
The images are the prescribed full sensor res (2008x3008 px) I can't 
see how
greater colour depth or interpolated pixels will make it any better?


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998