Thanks Paul, I appreciate the response.  


--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The two lenses are supposedly identical in regard to
> optics, although 
> the M42 has a larger filter ring. In any case, the K
> is at least the 
> equal of the screwmount. They turn up on ebay from
> time to time for 
> $350 to $400.
> Paul
> On Nov 28, 2004, at 12:15 PM, Steve Pearson wrote:
> 
> > I would LOVE to have a K85/1.8!  Anyone know where
> I
> > can find one???  I assume it is as good as the M42
> > versions?  I was thinking of getting the M42
> version
> > and then an adaptor to mount it to the istD. 
> Finding
> > a K mount version would be better, assuming it is
> as
> > good as the screw mount.  What are the opinions of
> the
> > K Vs. the M42 85/1.8 lens?
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I have an A50/1.7. I find it to be an excellent
> >> lens, sharp and with high
> >> contrast. Though I used it quite a bit in the
> past,
> >> it now resides on a back
> >> shelf in the equipment closet in a sealed Glad
> bag
> >> with a little packet of
> >> silica gel. Of the 50's, I use the A50/1.4 almost
> >> exclusively, not that it's
> >> better. In fact I think the A50/1.7 is just as
> good
> >> and lighter. It's just
> >> that it's what I use of the 50's. Occasionally I
> >> throw on the A50/1.2 just
> >> because it's big glass, but it's not near as good
> as
> >> the A50/1.4 or A50/1.7.
> >> I strongly dislike the A50/2, I think it's crap.
> >> Perhaps I just have a bad
> >> sample - misfortunes of mass production. The lens
> >> most commonly found on my
> >> camera is actually the K85/1.8. If you don't have
> >> one, you need to get one.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Bob...
> >>
> >> From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>
> >>>> While I like my lenses (otherwise I wouldn't
> have
> >> them), and
> >>>> especially like the 1.7 for its size and light
> >> weight, it doesn't,
> >>>> to my eye, have any particularly outstanding
> >> optical
> >>>> characteristics.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, Shel, I personally would agree.  However, I
> >> was just hoping to
> >>> get some of the "as-yet-unheard-from" 50/1.7
> fans
> >> involved in the
> >>> discussion.  After all, a thread on "Pentax's
> Best
> >> 50mm Lens" would
> >>> theoretically be relevant to almost any PDML
> >> member - <g>.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >             
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
> > http://my.yahoo.com
> >
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to