for highest quality at reasonable price, CRTs are still better. LCD are tough to calibrate and are viewing position sensitive for critical color. if you're going to do much photographic work, at least the viewing position sensitivity may be annoying. if you aren't planning to calibrate anyway, LCD or CRT isn't as important. LCDs tend to be brighter though.
Herb... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jaume Lahuerta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 11:47 AM Subject: OT: Help, CRT 'collapsed', LCD monitor for photography? > The logical choice would be to switch to a LCD 17" > monitor (I have some space issues), although I am a > bit concerned about the ability of this kind of > screens to handle pictures at this moment (for a > reasonable price, let's say under $600).
