I have used mine (SMC PENTAX-F 1.7x AF Adapter) on the MZ-S, before I sold it to finance a *ist D. It's brilliant. The AF of the MZ-S is even better/faster than the *ist D. You'll get very sharp images. I use the AF adapter a lot. Especially at long distances I get more accurate focus, using MF. Having owned AF cameras (PZ-1) for 12 years, I regret not having bought this adapter a long time ago. It works fine with all lenses; K, M or A. It's really a pitty they've stoped making it. It's allways in my bag, since I have quite a few MF lenses.
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 12. december 2004 03:34 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: AF adapters Thanks, Peter..I'll go shopping. Jack --- "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't speak to the AF adapter on an MZ-S, but the > adapter itself is a > very fine rear converter. > By itself that's reason enough to get one. It works > well with K, M, and > A lenses on autofocus > camera bodys. > > Jack Davis wrote: > > >To the well again.. > >Could someone please give me a brief comment or two > on > >the desirability of an AF adapter? K, M and A > lenses > >on the MZ-S. > >Haven't connected with any web info. > > > >Thanks, > > > >Jack > > > > > > > >__________________________________ > >Do you Yahoo!? > >Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced > search. Learn more. > >http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. > During a war you get to drive tanks through the > sides of buildings > and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually > frowned on during peacetime. > --P.J. O'Rourke > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
