Color only became available to the snapshooter in the 1950's. It cost quite a lot more than the standard B&W and so did not become really popular until the 60's. By the 70's the only ones using B&W were the "artsey" types. So you could say that it took color about 20 years to suplant B&W.

As for digital replacing film, for snapshooters it is actually just a better 110 or diskfilm camera (small). Rather than something truely new.

graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-----------------------------------




Jens Bladt wrote:
Shel
Sadly this is true (the B&W stuff). I am, however, quite surprised that
black and white have lasted this long. Colour photography was invented app.
100 years ago. So, it has taken 100 years to out-compete black and white
photography. That's really quite amazing. I still think it has a future. Not
for every mans everyday pictures. But for art work.

When painting started taking off (a thousand years ago??) one of the objects
was to make realistic paintings. Just before photography was invented, the
painters started using lenses to project images on to the canvas. This way
it became easy to paint realistic portraits etc. Since photography took over
the realistic stuff, painters have invented all the abstract styles of
painting, which photographers couldn't really accomplish.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, that since colour photography has become
every mans possession (digital is easy and very cheap), black and white
photography will surely survive (if at all) as an art form.

All the best


Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 13. december 2004 19:28 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: The film is dead


Many of those researgentes don't know what B&W is, so they use chromogenic B&W film and color materials. Yesterday I was at a local art supply and framing store, a customer was having a B&W print from a "Professional" photographer framed. It was printed on color material and had a decidedly red cast to it. But it was monochrome, (well sort of if you squinted your eyes and didn't engage your brain).

Shel Belinkoff wrote:


OTOH, we are now seeing, it seems, a resurgence in B&W.  Maybe I'm reading
it all wrong, but in my mind, the signs are there.  New films have come
out, old ones seem to be ressurected and given a new push, some recent
articles have appeared in various places touting B&W.  So, maybe there's
some hope yet.  Or maybe I'm a dreamer.

Shel





[Original Message]
From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





My own thought (I realize that I may be wrong, I only work in the
film processing industry so I doubt if I have a clue about the
direction the industry will go, I am only viewing trends) is that the
consumer film industry is pretty much dead in the water in a leaky
ship with a busted bilge pump.
The ship is going down, and there isn't anything that is going to
stop it from happenning.
The pro film sector is a barge tied to the leaky ship, and when the
ship sinks, it will take pro film with it, since one is towing the
other along.

William Robb










--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during
peacetime.
        --P.J. O'Rourke








Reply via email to