> Recently I posted a photo of a mailbox taken with the K105/2.8. > Even at the small size required for web viewing the bokeh was > nowhere near as bad as that which you've shown us. > http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/mailboxes/catbox.html
Hi, Shel. I'd say that the bokeh in the photo of your "catbox" (not what I usually picture when I visualize a "catbox", i.e., a "litterbox" - <g>) is somewhat like the bokeh in my http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/k105f28/105ndl56.jpg . Maybe I just had a bad sample? - I don't know - it was a very sharp lens, with lots of contrast. Nonetheless, I almost never have had a lens which such a fast "turn-around time" (the time from getting it to getting rid of it). All of my 85's and 135's had better bokeh, and all of my 100-ish (90mm to 105mm) macro lenses were similar to the K 105/2.8 or better. Fred
