Ooh, DejaVu! (This post showed up yesterday,
the list has been a bit twitchy) ;-)
And I responded:

Sorry, misused my letters.
I was referring to a *manual* version as versus A,F or FA.
Hence the reference to Green Button/stopping down being
6/half dozen.
I can see the SMCT bringing that much easily.
Mine is just a ST and I love it, I consider $150 a bargain
for the quality.

Don

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 6:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Was it really worth that much?
> 
> 
> It's a K lens Don. The M 85, which is much less expensive, is an 85/2. 
> My SMCT version went for $270 a few months ago.
> Paul
> On Dec 16, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
> 
> > Actually, having had a "taste" of what this lens can do
> > by using the ST 85/1.9, and having heard past prices,
> > I was amazed it lasted almost 10 hours.
> > I wouldn't have paid that much for the M version when
> > I could get the SMCT for much less.
> > I don't find stop down operation much of a bother,
> > you have to close the aperture but DON'T have to hit
> > the "Green Button" on the D, six one, half dozen the other.
> > I WOULD give that much in a *heartbeat* for an A, F or FA
> > version, if it was nearly as good!
> >
> > Don
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Collin R Brendemuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 4:15 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Was it really worth that much?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3860946186
> >> &ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT
> >> "You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The
> >> closer the
> >> relationship the greater the impact."
> >> Howard Hendricks
> >>
> >
> 

Reply via email to