Hi Jens,
I see the similarity, Except that the cliffs in your picture are on a somewhat larger scale.
Rgds Patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:54:28 2004This reminds me of the Cliffs of Moher, County Clare, Ireland: http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt/DreamHC/Side15.html
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 9. december 2004 03:10 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: Cliffs Near Hasan's Cave
Great light and wonderful sky - they make this image.
Kenneth Waller
----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Genovese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 6:27 PM
Subject: PESO: Cliffs Near Hasan's Cave
Taken near Hasan's Cave on Malta's Southern coast one very very cold Sunday (late) afteroon. Equipment MZ-S + FA50 1.4 + Tripod - Media Fuji Velvia 50
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2941279
Comments & Critique Welcome.
Patrick
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:54:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:54:28 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx118.postini.com ([64.18.0.32] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeIke-0008Sv-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:54:28 -0800
Received: from source ([216.125.202.199]) by exprod5mx118.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:57:07 EST
Received: (qmail 30078 invoked by uid 80); 14 Dec 2004 19:30:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 30070 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2004 19:30:25 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-ng-0.1.6.4-03dc on tech-geeks.org
From: "Tim Suter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:29:47 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Importance: Normal
X-AntiVirus: Checked for viruses by Gordano's AntiVirus Software
X-AntiSpam: Checked for restricted content by Gordano's AntiSpam Software
Subject: RE: [tech-geeks] Upgrade to AR 6 on Mac OS 7.x
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
OS8.6 uses somewhat similar OS architecture as OS 9.x. Gosh, for not being a huge Mac fan. I know my fair share. IT WAS FORCED ON ME I TELL YOU>>>>FORCED.
Timothy E. Suter
CUSD #205 Assistant Director of Technology
A+, Net+
309-337-6344
-----Original Message-----
From: Georgia Hoggatt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [tech-geeks] Upgrade to AR 6 on Mac OS 7.x
AR requires at least 8.6 for the newest upgrade - I just finished upgrading! You'll have to stick with 5.xx for OS 7.x.
:) Georgia
On Tuesday, December 14, 2004, at 10:29 AM, Chris Janssen wrote:
Any of the mac gurus out there---
I've got some older macs running OS 7.x. When I try to upgrade the AR
program to 6.x it won't run the install program. I imagine this is an old
OS showing its limitations in working with newer stuffit installers. Is it
possible to run the upgrade on these machines, and if so can you point me in
a general direction?
Thanks,
Chris
Chris Janssen
Technology Coordinator
Avon CUSD 176
Avon, Illinois
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.avonschools.us
309-465-3621
Fax - 309-465-7194
Mrs. Georgia A. Hoggatt Technology Coordinator Metamora CCSD #1 815 E. Chatham Metamora, IL 61548 309-2361
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:54:28 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:54:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:54:28 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx97.postini.com ([64.18.0.85] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeIke-0008Sr-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:54:28 -0800
Received: from source ([217.76.128.98]) by exprod5mx97.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:57:06 EST
Received: from llla207-a.servidoresdns.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by llla207-a.servidoresdns.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BDE9FAF03C; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:54:34 +0100 (CET)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp-01.servidoresdns.net (llsa614-a01.servidoresdns.net
[217.76.146.203])
by llla207-a.servidoresdns.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE11BAEFAA
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:54:22 +0100 (CET)
Received: from asmtp01.eresmas.com (asmtp05.eresmas.com [62.81.235.145])
by smtp-01.servidoresdns.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE123DD033
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:50:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.108.58] (helo=mx01.eresmas.com)
by asmtp01.eresmas.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1CeHkn-0000Gy-SY
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:50:33 +0100
Received: from [80.38.237.241] (helo=seldonswork)
by mx01.eresmas.com with asmtp (Exim 4.41)
id 1CeHkn-0004kh-46
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:50:33 +0100
From: "Hari Seldon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [ASNativos] problema de recursividad en actionscript
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:51:35 +0100
Organization: privado
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Thread-Index: AcThw4DcmJloP0BtTNmQOgHfSmbg7wAAmEiwABH0zTA=
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b2
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: Lista dedicada a Actionscript <5dms.com.asnativos.5dms.com>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://list.5dms.com/mailman/listinfo/5dms.com.asnativos>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://list.5dms.com/mailman/listinfo/5dms.com.asnativos>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://list.5dms.com/mailman/private/5dms.com.asnativos>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
=BFPara parsear XML?=20
=BFDe cu=E1ntos nodos de profundidad?
Yo en =E1rboles de m=E1s de 3 nodos de profundidad, obten=EDa mejores resultados ley=E9ndolos secuencialmente, que utilizando funciones = recursivas. Eso si, con AS 1.0.
(Y te aseguro que hice un testeo importante, los =E1rboles q ten=EDamos pesaban entre 50 y 100 kb y la velocidad de parseo y que no se quedase "torrado" el flash player eran bastante vitales)
Saludos.
haciendo-----Mensaje original----- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Joseba Alonso Enviado el: martes, 14 de diciembre de 2004 11:19 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: [ASNativos] problema de recursividad en actionscript =20 A ver si me equivoco...pero creo que no declaras la variable=20 en el for. Si no es por eso, ser=E1 por otra raz=F3n pero la variable se esta =
persistente en el objeto de activaci=F3n de la funci=F3n. =20 Deber=EDas tener algo as=ED: =20 for(var i:Number=3D0;i<=3D4;i++) =20 sino es as=ED env=EDa una versi=F3n reducida de la funci=F3n=20 recursiva a ver que pasa. Yo las uso mucho para parsear XML y nunca he tenido ese=20 problema. =20 Un saludo, =20 Joseba Alonso www.5dms.com www.sidedev.net =20 =20 -----Mensaje original----- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de David Pariente Enviado el: martes, 14 de diciembre de 2004 10:56 Para: ACTION SCRIPT Asunto: [ASNativos] problema de recursividad en actionscript =20 Hola a [EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 Bien...estoy haciendo un foro en flash, para lo que estoy usando recursividad. =20 Dentro de una funcion, hago un bucle for, i dentro de este, la funcion de llama a si misma. =20 Pues...cuando la recursividad se efectua hacia adentro...es decir...la funcion se llama asi misma, i se vuelve a hacer todo el bucle for de nuevo, no hay ningun problema. =20 El problema biene cuando la recursividad es hacia afuera...es decir...salgo de la funcion...i vuelvo a la funcion madre. al volver a la funcion madre, EL INDICE DEL BUCLE FOR SE HA ACTUALIZADO!! :O =20 Es decir...por ejemplo...tengo un for i un indice que ejecuta el for desde i=3D0 a i=3D4...en i=3D2 la funcion se ejecuta a si misma...i hace el bucle for de i=3D0 a i=3D4...ningun problema, cuando acaba, vuelve a la funcion madre ...i DEBERIA CONTINUAR EN EL i=3D3...pero en lugar de eso...simplemente deja de ejecutarse i sale del bucle for. =20 Da la impresion de q al volver a la funcion madre, i vale 4, en vez de valer 3 que es lo q deberia pasar...:O =20 En otros lenguages no tenia problemas, ya que i, aun teniendo el mismo nombre, se guarda en casillas de memoria diferentes. pero en flash da la impresion que i se machaca a si mismo :O =20 bien...seguramente alguno de vosotros ha utilizado recursividad en actionscript i se ha encontrado antes con este problema. Estoy seguro que debe de haber alguna forma de hacerlo, que no sea muy chapucera :) =20 Muchas gracias a [EMAIL PROTECTED], a ver si a alguien se le ocurre algo :) =20 =20 =09 ______________________________________________=20 Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: =A1250 MB GRATIS!=20 Nuevos servicios, m=E1s seguridad=20 http://correo.yahoo.es ---------------------------------- Lista ASNativos:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.5dms.com/listas ---------------------------------- =20 =20 ---------------------------------- Lista ASNativos:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.5dms.com/listas ---------------------------------- =20
----------------------------------
Lista ASNativos:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.5dms.com/listas
----------------------------------
From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:54:30 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:54:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:54:30 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx14.postini.com ([64.18.0.154] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeIkg-0008Sp-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:54:30 -0800
Received: from source ([209.239.33.40]) by exprod5mx14.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:57:06 PST
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by host24.websitesource.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id iBEJv6UW015532
for [email protected]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:57:06 -0500
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:55:56 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: host24.websitesource.com: dbrewer set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f
From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SV: SV: The film is dead
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:15:35 -0500
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by host24.websitesource.com id iBEJtp4V013910
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/134778
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.1034 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64
"Joakim Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob Studdert Wrote: <Do you seriously think that film manufacturers are going to keep non-profitable film production lines on ice for those people across the globe who still don't have electricity (let alone the ability to afford cameras/film/processing or prints)? >
Answer:
I do not think so, and that wasn�t my point. I do think that there is going
to be a need for film for many years to come. And the reason for that is
that only 5 percent of all people on this planet have a computer and access
to the Internet.
What on earth does having a computer or access to the Internet have to do with this??? Nothing. (I'd wager that much *fewer* than 5% have a C41 processor and print minilab!) The infrastructure for getting a print from digital is far less than that needed to get a print from color film.
And what you probably didn�t even think about is that film based cameras still is the most spread camera type on this planet, by far.
I'm sure he did think about it, but realized that it was irrelevant when
both film manufacturing and use are in precipitous decline. Film
manufacturing volume is determined by how much film people actually
*use*, not the number of cameras available for them to use it in!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
From jeff Tue Dec 14 19:54:32 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 11:54:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:54:32 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx128.postini.com ([64.18.0.42] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeIki-0008TQ-00
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:54:32 -0800
Received: from source ([62.80.28.11]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx128.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:57:09 PST
Received: from draenor.its-toasted.org ([62.80.28.8] ident=list)
by thrall.its-toasted.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
id 1CeImn-0005uP-NO; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:56:41 +0100
Received: from smtp04.wanadoo.nl ([194.134.35.144])
by draenor.its-toasted.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CeImk-00079S-9k
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:56:38 +0100
Received: from localhost (c3eea0c52.cable.wanadoo.nl [62.234.12.82])
by smtp4.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7DC11ED
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:56:28 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:56:30 +0100
From: Henk de Bruijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.2.10) Professional
Organization: Secured by Design
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kevin Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Rogue: :Henk:
X-PGP: key request at http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x12069B93DBE6E678
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Greylisted-at: draenor.its-toasted.org
Subject: Re: automaticly closing down
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
List-Unsubscribe: <http://stromgrade.its-toasted.org/mailman/listinfo/tbbeta>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://stromgrade.its-toasted.org/mailman/listinfo/tbbeta>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0627097668=="
Mime-version: 1.0
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:23.48734/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN autolearn=no version=2.64
--===============0627097668==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="----------B2FDB5115BF89F"------------B2FDB5115BF89F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Kevin,
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:57:31 -0500GMT (14-12-2004, 16:57 +0100, where I live), you wrote:
KC> Ahh ... so you were running another relay. That hasn't been a problem KC> here using SpamPal 1.641 its plugins:
KC> Bayesian Filter KC> P2P plugin KC> RegExFilter KC> SubjectChange KC> URLBody
KC> I've only toggled 4 Blacklists and 7 countries. Perhaps its a lost KC> connection due to excessive delays? Using broadband here.
Can you let me know which settings I have to use for the Bat! to avoid conflicts with GPGrelay.
--=20 cheers, Henk ______________________________________________________________________ :beta: The Bat!=99 Natural Email System v3.0.2.10 Professional on Windows X= P SP2 PGP Key Request: See Headers or send email with subj.: send HenksKeyID Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://gswot.webhop.info/ ------------B2FDB5115BF89F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFBv0VuEgabk9vm5ngRAhW9AKDwP5sPtWoN0gZoH9ftWi5AJRXVkgCg4SgG NlMji/otyYJUa9ZyGa9hGIQ= =KuJc -----END PGP MESSAGE-----
------------B2FDB5115BF89F--
--===============0627097668== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/ --===============0627097668==--
