It's fare based on likely results, but not on optimal results. You can achieve a better result with film
than with digital, but that's not usually possible. That's why I expect to keep a film body or two for
B&W until you can no longer get film.


Bruce Dayton wrote:

A reality in my neck of the woods, is that it is not reasonably
possible to get optical prints.  All the labs have gone digital and
are therefore scanning your film.  Even my 67 stuff was not looking
that impressive.  So for a reasonable cost per print and not having to
travel long distances, comparing scanned film (digital) to digital is
more fair than it seems.





--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war. During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings and shoot foreigners - two things that are usually frowned on during peacetime.
--P.J. O'Rourke




Reply via email to