Are we talking about the same hood, Paul? Shel
> [Original Message] > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 12/18/2004 5:53:22 AM > Subject: Re: Speaking of hoods > > The Takumar 24/3.5 hood is a perfect fit for the M35/2. It obviously > won't provide optimum coverage, but it seems to be adequate, and it > looks great :-). > Paul > On Dec 18, 2004, at 8:27 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > I've not observed vignetting using the 24/3.5 hood on my 18/3.5, but > > you > > can certainly use the Takumar hood made for the 20/4.5 with no > > problems. > > > > The Tak 105/2.8 hood should be fine on the 85/2.0. I use it on the > > M50/1.4 > > with no vignetting or problems. > > > > Shel > > > > > >> [Original Message] > >> From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Date: 12/18/2004 5:08:38 AM > >> Subject: Speaking of hoods > >> > >> > >> I have a couple of questions about hoods: > >> > >> - I believe the Takumar 24/3.5 hood vignettes on my K18/3.5. Perhaps I > >> am not careful enough to align it, but on the rare occasion I use > >> this lens I have seen vignetting. Any other options, seeing as one > >> can't easily source the one for the 18? A tulip perhaps? Andre, I > >> don't do DIY, thanks :-))) > >> > >> - Will the Takumar 105/2.8-100/4 hood vignette on the M85/2 (which I > >> have now had cleaned and may try to sell again, but would like to > >> use it until it leaves my hands)? I know, I could test it. At f2? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Kostas > > > >
