Niether, Amita.
What the meter does, is to try to reach an exposure, that in average give
you the same "brightness" as a grey card (18% reflection). Matrix metering,
however, can furthermore help to illuminate the impact of a very bright sky
i.e., which would normally cause under exposure.

In extreme situations, like the snowy scenery, only your own judgement is
good enough. After all, the camera doesn't know that it's snow, just like it
has no way of knowing whether you are photographing a white horse or a black
bear! You have to know! When the camera sees a snowy scenery, it really
"believes" that it's very bright, then stops down to get "normal" brightness
of the scenery. Thus rendering the white snow as grey, due to under
exposure. I agree that the LCD is a brilliant tool for judging exposure. It
difficult to identify burned out highlights, though.


Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Amita Guha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 29. december 2004 01:33
Til: [email protected]
Emne: Metering the istD in the snow


I found out the hard way over the weekend that the istD's evaluative
metering doesn't work in the snow. While I was out, I switched to manual and
got the right settings through trial and error. Thank goodness for the LCD
screen!

So which is better on the istD in the snow, center weighted or spot
metering? Or should I just learn to eyeball it?

Thanks,
Amita




Reply via email to