I believe it was the "Bayonette Takumar" lenses that were not super-multi-coated.
graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" -----------------------------------
Steve Jolly wrote:
William Robb wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Trevor Bailey" Subject: RE: Strange
G'day All. I have a similar lens. It is a TAKUMAR-F ZOOM 70-200 4-5.6 I wonder what the difference is between the TAKUMAR and the PENTAX?
The Pentax lenses are multicoated on every glass/air surface.
The Takumars are multicoated on the front and back surfaces only, and single coated on the internal air/glass surfaces.
Thats what my rep told me, anyway.
That's the difference between SMC lenses and non-SMC lenses. The difference between non-SMC "Pentax" lenses and non-SMC "Takumar" lenses is limited to the name and the region in which the lens was first sold, I believe.
S
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 12/30/2004
